FinWiki
日EN中

Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan

Confidence: Likely Updated 2026-05-25 Review by 2026-11-25 Sources 4 Machine-translated Original (JA)
#JapanFG#insurance#policyholder-protection#financial-safety-net
On this page

Wiki route

This entry sits under financial-regulators INDEX. Read it against Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation for a parallel safety-net peer and Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan (DIC) / Financial Services Agency (FSA) for the broader system / regulatory boundary.

TL;DR

An authorized corporation for the protection of policyholders, of which all non-life insurance companies operating domestically are members. It was established with the enforcement of the 1998-12 revised Insurance Business Act. It serves as the last safety net responsible for continuing the contracts of a failed non-life insurer + paying insurance claims + assuming contracts. Its funds consist of “assessments” contributed by members and “subsidies from the government (in the case of special measures).” It responded to the wave of non-life insurer failures in the latter half of the 1990 年s through the early 2000 年s (Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan 2000-05 / SOMPO Holdings (Sompo Holdings) 2001-11 / Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance 1996 , etc.). Its current membership is on the scale of 24 社 domestic non-life insurers. Together with the life-insurance version (Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation), it forms one of the two major insurance safety nets.

1. Legal basis / establishment

Legal name: Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation (損害保険契約者保護機構) English name: Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan Legal basis: Insurance Business Act, Article 259 and following (revised in 1995 年, fully enforced 1998-12 ) Established: 1998-12-01 Head office: Kanda-Awaji-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Type: authorized corporation Jurisdiction: Financial Services Agency (FSA) / the Ministry of Finance (jurisdiction over the statute)

Membership obligation

Key timeline

DateEvent
1995-06Full revision of the Insurance Business Act enacted (the old law was 1939)
1998-12Enforcement of the new Insurance Business Act / establishment of the Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation
2000-05**Failure of [[financial-regulators/dai-ichi-mutual
2001-11**Failure of [[non-life-insurers/taisei-kasai
2002-06Revision of the Insurance Business Act → extension / expansion of the special-measure government subsidy
2010-04Review of the assessment system amid a phase of frequent natural disasters
2011-03The Great East Japan Earthquake → debate on the earthquake-insurance reinsurance scheme and mutual complementarity
2024〜Debate on the management integration of mid-tier non-life insurers and the stability of the Corporation’s finances

2. Business scheme

BusinessContent
Assumption of a failed insurance company’s contractsWhen no rescuing insurance company appears, the Corporation itself (or via a succeeding company) assumes the contracts
Financial assistance to a rescuing insurance companyA monetary grant when a rescuing insurance company takes over the failed insurance company
Compensation for insurance-claim paymentsCompensates a certain proportion of insurance-claim rights that had already arisen at the time of failure
Compensation for surrender refunds, etc.Compensates a certain proportion of surrender refunds, maturity refunds, etc.
Collection of assessmentsCollected from member non-life insurers each fiscal year (apportioned by premium income, etc.)
Borrowing of fundsBorrows from financial institutions when necessary (with a government guarantee)

Compensation levels (main lines)

Insurance lineCompensation level
Compulsory automobile liability insurance (CALI)100% (top priority because it is compulsory insurance)
Earthquake insurance100% (under the government reinsurance scheme)
Automobile insurance (voluntary)Accidents arising within 3 months after failure are 100%; thereafter 80%
Fire insurance (individual)80% (100% within 3 months after failure)
Liability insurance80%
Marine / transport / credit insurance, etc. (for enterprises)80%
  • Compensation levels vary by contract type and time of failure. For the latest details of the system, refer to the Corporation’s official website.

3. Funding structure

Revenue
  ├── Assessments (contributed by members 24 社, apportioned by premium income)
  ├── Borrowings (when necessary, with a government guarantee)
  └── Government subsidy (in the case of special measures, supplementary provisions of the Insurance Business Act)

Expenditure
  ├── Financial assistance to rescuing insurance companies
  ├── Operating expenses of succeeding insurance companies
  ├── Direct compensation payments to policyholders
  └── Operating expenses of the Corporation

Assessment calculation

4. Past rescue cases

DateFailed non-life insurerResolution scheme
1996Taisho Marine & FireRescue merger (assumed by Sumitomo Marine)
2000-05**[[financial-regulators/dai-ichi-mutual第一火災海上]]**
2001-11**[[non-life-insurers/taisei-kasai大成火災海上]]**
2008Yamato Life (a [[financial-regulators/seimei-hokensha-hogo-kiko生保機構]] case, as it is life insurance)

From the middle of the 2000s onward, failure cases decreased substantially due to the management integration of mid-tier non-life insurers (the formation process of Sompo Japan Insurance / Aioi Nissay Dowa Insurance, etc.).

5. International comparison / issues

  • Close to the State Guaranty Fund system under U.S. NAIC guidelines, but Japan has a single nationwide corporation (the U.S. has one per state)
  • Whereas the U.K.’s FSCS (Financial Services Compensation Scheme) unifies banking and insurance, Japan keeps the Deposit Insurance Corporation, the life-insurance corporation, and the non-life-insurance corporation separate
    • Review of the assessment system under climate-related risk (frequent and intensifying natural disasters)
    • Development of compensation schemes in response to the expansion of new insurance lines such as cyber insurance and pet insurance
    • Debate over the decline in membership and the financial base as the management integration of non-life insurers advances

Sources

[!info] Verification status