L2 Agent Economics · AI Agent Workload Comparison of Arbitrum vs Base vs Optimism
On this page
- TL;DR
- Wiki route
- 3 L2 basic parameter comparison (2026-Q1)
- Per-transaction cost · agent workload perspective
- Sequencer MEV implications for agents
- Gas sponsorship / Paymaster availability
- Base + Coinbase CDP Paymaster
- Arbitrum + Alchemy / Pimlico / Biconomy
- Optimism + third parties similar to Arbitrum
- Paymaster strategy comparison
- Native stablecoin liquidity · USDC Native vs Bridged
- Developer defaults · Coinbase CDP / Privy / AWS AgentCore
- Arbitrum differentiation: DeFi depth + Orbit + Stylus
- Optimism differentiation: Superchain + RetroPGF
- Bundled UserOp + Batched settlement · actual agent cost
- Network effects of Privy / Coinbase CDP / AWS AgentCore defaults
- CCTP V2 + chain abstraction · agent multi-chain architecture
- Per-tx measured economics comparison table (2026-Q1)
- Agent-relevant security / risk-control considerations
- Agent workload L2 decision tree
- Related
- Sources
TL;DR
For AI agent workloads in 2026 年, L2 selection is converging on Base as the default, while Arbitrum + Optimism each capture some niches (Arbitrum for DeFi-heavy agents + institutions, Optimism for the OP Stack ecosystem + public goods). The per-transaction costs of the 3 L2 s, after Pectra EIP-7691 · blob doubling and the L2 economic chain, all fall into the $0.001-0.01 range, but Base has the full-stack default of Coinbase CDP + USDC Native + Coinbase Smart Wallet + ERC-4337 paymaster, almost automatically steering agent developers’ “L2 selection” decision toward Base. Arbitrum’s edge is deeper DeFi liquidity (GMX / Camelot / Pendle)+ Stylus (WASM)+ Orbit RaaS as a path for institutional agents to build their own chains. Optimism’s edge is the Superchain network effect (World, Zora, Worldcoin)+ retroactive funding, but its share in agent-payment scenarios is the smallest. Sequencer MEV is still extracted by centralized sequencers on all 3 chains, making it a potential risk for high-frequency agent payments.
Wiki route
This entry sits under systems index. Read it against ERC-4337 overview and ERC-4337 wallet adoption to understand the wallet layer for agent transactions, and against agent economy index to see the evolution of the full agent-payment protocol stack. For the economic background of per-transaction costs, see Pectra EIP-7691 blob expansion.
3 L2 basic parameter comparison (2026-Q1)
| Perspective | Base | Arbitrum One | Optimism Mainnet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | OP Stack (Bedrock + Fault Proof) | Arbitrum Nitro (custom rollup) | OP Stack (Bedrock + Fault Proof) |
| TVL (DefiLlama, 2026-Q1) | ~$8-10B | ~$15-20B | ~$1-2B |
| Daily tx | ~3-5M | ~2-3M | ~300-500k |
| Average per-tx user fee (post-Pectra) | $0.001-0.005 | $0.002-0.01 | $0.001-0.005 |
| DA layer | Ethereum blob | Ethereum blob (Nova partly uses AnyTrust DA) | Ethereum blob |
| Sequencer centralization | Coinbase single sequencer | Offchain Labs single sequencer (BoLD fault proof + decentralization plan) | Optimism Foundation single sequencer (decentralization plan) |
| Native USDC | USDC Native (Circle, 2023-09 launch) | USDC Native (2023-06 launch) | USDC Native (2023-09 launch) |
| Bridged USDC | USDbC (deprecated, user migration mostly complete) | USDC.e (legacy, still exists) | USDC.e (legacy, still exists) |
| Smart wallet default | Coinbase Smart Wallet (ERC-4337) | Multiple third parties (Safe / Biconomy, etc.) | Multiple third parties |
| Paymaster commercial product | Coinbase CDP Paymaster | Alchemy Account Kit / Biconomy / Pimlico | Alchemy Account Kit / Biconomy / Pimlico |
| Known large agent / payment integrations | x402 / Coinbase Agent Kit / Privy default | GMX agent / DeFi agent / some institutions | World mini-apps / Worldcoin |
Per-transaction cost · agent workload perspective
Typical AI agent workloads:
- micropayment (per 1 API call charged at $0.001-0.10 ): per-tx cost must be below $0.005 ; Base/Optimism satisfy this, while Arbitrum is on the boundary
- periodic settlement (daily / hourly batching of many small settlements): with batch contracts + bundled UserOp (ERC-4337), per-call is distributed to the $0.0005 order; all 3 chains can do it
- DeFi-action agent (swap / lend / stake): per-tx $0.01-0.10, acceptable on all 3 chains, with Arbitrum advantaged by DeFi depth
- bridge-action agent (cross-chain asset funding): per-bridge $0.20-2.00 (including CCTP V2 burn-mint + L1 finality + target-chain mint), expensive but low-frequency
Post-Pectra data: EIP-7691 raised the Ethereum blob target from 3 to 6 per block + max 9, directly reducing L2 calldata cost to 2023 年’s 1/3-1/5 . See Pectra EIP-7691 · blob doubling and the L2 economic chain for details.
Sequencer MEV implications for agents
All 3 chains are still single centralized sequencers, directly affecting agents as follows:
- front-running risk: High-value swap / arbitrage agents can be subject to sequencer reordering inside the mempool time window; none of Base / Arbitrum / Optimism has mandatory FCFS or fair ordering
- time-boost auction (Arbitrum, 2024-04 launch): users can pay to cut in line, effectively institutionalizing MEV-via-priority; searchers can bid for priority inclusion, and moderately sensitive agents need to budget for time-boost costs
- Base private mempool: Coinbase provided an optional private bundle route for Smart Wallet customers in 2024-2025 , partly mitigating sandwich attacks
- Optimism Superchain shared sequencer roadmap: In theory, OP Stack chains can introduce cross-chain atomic execution by sharing a sequencer; not deployed in production as of 2026 年
- decentralized sequencer: included in the roadmaps of all 3 chains, but as of 2026 年 none has meaningful mainnet progress; centralized sequencers remain a trust assumption agents must accept
- agent practical advice: For high-value swaps, use chain abstraction patterns and route transactions through batch-auction paths such as Cowswap / 1inch / Skip, avoiding a sequencer single point of failure
Gas sponsorship / Paymaster availability
ERC-4337 paymaster allows dApp / agent platforms to pay gas on behalf of users, removing the biggest UX obstacle of “needing ETH.” Comparison of 3 chains:
Base + Coinbase CDP Paymaster
- Product: Coinbase CDP Paymaster
- Pricing: gas sponsorship + Coinbase fee markup, with daily / per-user caps configurable
- Integration depth: Natively bound to Coinbase Smart Wallet, completing SCA creation + the first sponsored tx in 1 step
- Agent friendliness: Coinbase Agent Kit + AgentKit SDK uses CDP by default, almost zero friction
- Constraints: Coinbase risk controls + KYC data belong to Coinbase; agents are restricted in some jurisdictions
Arbitrum + Alchemy / Pimlico / Biconomy
- Products: Alchemy Account Kit, Pimlico, Biconomy, Stackup all support Arbitrum
- Mechanism: Third-party paymaster service, charged according to sponsored gas volume, usually with 5-15% markup
- Integration: Requires self-integration on the dApp side; there is no “default full-stack” experience
- Institution-friendly: Alchemy Account Kit provides SOC2 + enterprise SLA for institutional devs
Optimism + third parties similar to Arbitrum
- Almost the same paymaster choices as Arbitrum, but the agent ecosystem is smaller and there are fewer concrete SDK integration cases
Paymaster strategy comparison
| Perspective | Base / CDP | Arbitrum / Alchemy family | Optimism / same |
|---|---|---|---|
| Default bound wallet | Coinbase Smart Wallet | Safe / Biconomy SCA | Safe / Biconomy SCA |
| Onboarding friction | Extremely low (Coinbase account = SCA) | Medium (wallet + paymaster selection required) | Medium |
| Sponsor markup | Built into Coinbase | 5-15% third-party markup | 5-15% |
| Agent SDK default | Coinbase Agent Kit + Privy AgentCore default | Each SDK | Each SDK |
| Regulation / KYC | Coinbase aggregation | Custom per paymaster | Custom per paymaster |
Native stablecoin liquidity · USDC Native vs Bridged
USDC Native (direct Circle issuance) vs USDC.e / USDbC (legacy bridges through Wormhole / OFT, etc.):
- Base: USDC Native launched in 2023-09 , USDbC migration is mostly complete, and Base USDC circulation is ~$3-5B (2026-Q1)
- Arbitrum: USDC Native launched in 2023-06 , but USDC.e legacy still has ~$500M-1B unmigrated (because of deep DeFi integrations), and total USDC is ~$3-4B
- Optimism: USDC Native launched in 2023-09 , USDC.e legacy is ~$200-400M, and total USDC is ~$500-800M
- CCTP V2 integration: Circle CCTP V2 burn-mint protocol has been deployed on all 3 chains; cross-L2 USDC transfer has 1-3 second finality + ~$0.01-0.10 fee
- Impact on agents: Agent stablecoin holding / settlement should use USDC Native (avoiding secondary depeg risk from legacy bridges); Base’s USDC liquidity + default SCA + CDP make Base the default stablecoin rail for agents
PYUSD / USDT0 / RLUSD are deployed on 3 chains, but are far smaller than USDC; stablecoin payment in 2026 年 is effectively synonymous with USDC payment.
Developer defaults · Coinbase CDP / Privy / AWS AgentCore
Agent developers’ L2 selection is pre-locked by wallet providers + cloud SDKs:
- Coinbase CDP: Base + USDC Native + Smart Wallet + Paymaster are the defaults; integration is a one-line implementation path, and agent settlement effectively defaults to Base
- Privy + AWS AgentCore: Privy creates Base + Ethereum + Solana wallets by default in AWS Bedrock AgentCore integration; the default for agent payment is USDC on Base
- x402 edge integration: x402 implementations by CDN/edge platforms such as Cloudflare / AWS / Vercel default to USDC on Base; the agent automatically chooses Base settlement through HTTP 402
- Alchemy Account Kit: Multi-chain support, but GTM prioritizes Arbitrum + Base + Optimism + Polygon and recommends multi-chain for agents
- Result: In 2025-2026, ~70%+ of new agent projects select Base as the settlement chain, while Arbitrum / Optimism / Polygon combined are ~30%; see embedded wallet network-effect moat for details
Arbitrum differentiation: DeFi depth + Orbit + Stylus
- DeFi liquidity: GMX (perps)+ Camelot + Pendle + Radiant + Vertex; DeFi-heavy agents (yield optimizer / perps trader / collateral manager) get the deepest liquidity on Arbitrum
- Orbit RaaS: Arbitrum Orbit gives enterprises / institutions / large DeFi protocols the option to build their own L3 ; Xai (gaming), Sanko, Cheese Chain, and others are live
- Stylus: WASM-based contract execution; Rust / C / C++ contracts can interoperate with EVM; 2024-04 mainnet; theoretically advantageous for high-performance agent compute, but actual adoption is slow
- Institutional customers: Some PayPal PYUSD on Arbitrum + some institutional Treasury deployments
- Conclusion: Arbitrum remains the first-choice agent option for “DeFi depth demand + L3 RaaS + Stylus performance”
Optimism differentiation: Superchain + RetroPGF
- Superchain: Base, World, Zora, Worldcoin, Mode, Lyra, Polynomial, and others share OP Stack codebase + governance + future sequencer
- RetroPGF (Retroactive Public Goods Funding): Periodically distributes OP tokens to public-goods contributors; over 5 rounds, ~$300M+ has been distributed
- agent scenario: World mini-apps (inside Worldcoin) are the largest real agent / mini-app deployment scenario, but diverge from the conventional ERC-4337 agent route
- Constraints: Optimism Mainnet’s own TVL and daily tx are far below Base / Arbitrum, and its direct agent deployment share is the smallest
Bundled UserOp + Batched settlement · actual agent cost
The actual per-action cost for agents is not “1 UserOp 1 settlement”; rather, the bundler aggregates N UserOps to send them to EntryPoint:
- Bundler economics: Bundlers such as Pimlico / Stackup / Alchemy / Biconomy package dozens to hundreds of UserOps into 1 件 L2 transaction
- per-UserOp distributed cost: Bundled UserOp on Base is ~$0.0003-0.001 (Pimlico 2026 public benchmark), Arbitrum is ~$0.0005-0.002, and Optimism is similar to Base
- bundler relationships: Agent platforms typically maintain long-term partnerships with 1-2 bundlers; bundlers adjust batch size in real time according to the L2 fee market
- session key + ERC-4337 v0.7+: Agents can request session-scoped keys (amount limits + time limits + contract allowlists), so users do not need to sign every time; this is a key UX breakthrough for commercializing agent payments
- ERC-7715 + 7710 (permission proposal)+ ERC-4337 v0.8 (roadmap) further reduce agent permission complexity; compare with ERC-7715 overview · Wallet Permissions and AI Agent auto-payment
- bundler centralization risk: The top 5 社 bundlers process ~80%+ of UserOps; bundler exit / regulation / outage affects agent-payment availability
Network effects of Privy / Coinbase CDP / AWS AgentCore defaults
When an agent project selects a wallet provider, L2 selection becomes materially constrained by wallet-provider integration defaults; see embedded wallet network effects moat for details:
- Privy creates ETH + Base + Solana wallets by default in AWS Bedrock AgentCore; once an agent goes through the AWS AgentCore route, Base becomes the default settlement chain in most practical integrations
- Coinbase CDP uses Base as the default chain in all SDK documentation examples; migration to other L2 requires reconfiguring paymaster / RPC / USDC addresses
- WalletConnect / Reown supports multiple chains, but GTM promotes Base + Arbitrum + Optimism + Polygon
- AWS / Cloudflare / Vercel edge integration defaults to USDC on Base; compare with x402 edge integration
- Actual selection distribution of new agent projects (2025-2026 industry informal survey basis): Base 60-70% / Arbitrum 15-20% / Optimism 5-10% / Polygon 5-10% / Other 5%
CCTP V2 + chain abstraction · agent multi-chain architecture
Agents are not bound to a single L2 ; they use home chain + multi-chain spending:
- Home chain pattern: The agent holds stablecoin / token on the home chain (usually Base), and crosses chains via CCTP V2 when spending is needed
- CCTP V2 fast finality: USDC burn-mint has 1-3 second finality, and cross-chain transfer per 1 time has a fee of $0.01-0.10
- Chain abstraction (compare with chain abstraction patterns): Skip Protocol / Connext / Across / Hyperlane Warp Route and others let the agent sign 1 intent on the source chain, with cross-chain settlement completed by a solver
- Typical agent flow: 1) User holds USDC on Base in Coinbase Smart Wallet → 2) agent triggers cross-chain spending → 3) bundler submits UserOp to Base → 4) CCTP V2 burns USDC on Base → 5) mints USDC on target L2 → 6) completes spending on target L2 ; full flow < 30 seconds
- Multi-chain agent practice: Most agent payments still complete inside Base; cross-chain scenarios concentrate in DeFi yield optimizers / cross-DEX arbitrage, < 20% of total agent-payment volume
Per-tx measured economics comparison table (2026-Q1)
| Workload | Base | Arbitrum | Optimism |
|---|---|---|---|
| EOA simple ETH transfer | ~$0.001 | ~$0.002 | ~$0.001 |
| EOA USDC transfer | ~$0.002 | ~$0.003 | ~$0.002 |
| SCA (ERC-4337) create + first sponsored tx | ~$0.005-0.015 | ~$0.01-0.03 | ~$0.005-0.015 |
| Bundled UserOp (per UserOp distributed) | ~$0.0003-0.001 | ~$0.0005-0.002 | ~$0.0003-0.001 |
| Uniswap V3 swap | ~$0.02-0.10 | ~$0.05-0.15 | ~$0.02-0.10 |
| CCTP V2 USDC burn-mint (cross-chain) | ~$0.01-0.10 each side | ~$0.02-0.15 each side | ~$0.01-0.10 each side |
| GMX perps open / close | n/a (mainly Arbitrum) | ~$0.10-0.50 | n/a |
| World mini-app action | n/a | n/a | ~$0.001-0.005(on World chain) |
| Blob congestion-period fee spike | ~10-50× | ~5-20× | ~10-50× |
Figures are from L2Beat + DefiLlama + Pimlico bundler benchmarks + Coinbase CDP public examples; actual volatility is high, so consult a real-time gas tracker.
Agent-relevant security / risk-control considerations
- session key design: Agent session keys must have chain id restrictions + contract allowlists + amount limits + time limits; otherwise loss is unlimited if stolen
- paymaster validation: Paymasters such as CDP / Pimlico run validatePaymasterUserOp before sponsoring; paymasters can reject some malicious contract calls
- bundle failure rollback: A single UserOp revert inside a bundled UserOp does not roll back the whole bundle, but the sponsor still bears gas
- chain reorg risk: Base / OP Mainnet occasionally have 1-2 block reorgs (rare); agent payments should preferably wait for ~12 blocks confirmation for sensitive transactions
- L1 fault proof window: Base / Arbitrum / Optimism all have a 7 -day fault proof window, and withdrawals to L1 require waiting, but this does not affect settlement inside L2
- sequencer regulation / sanctions: Coinbase, as a US-regulated entity, may block specific addresses under OFAC sanctions; agents need to consider that sanctioned wallets cannot settle on Base
Agent workload L2 decision tree
- General agent payment / micropayment: Base (default, CDP + Smart Wallet + USDC Native)
- DeFi-heavy yield / perps / collateral: Arbitrum (deep liquidity + GMX + Pendle)
- Enterprise / institutional proprietary agent chain: Arbitrum Orbit or OP Stack self-build (compare with Polygon AggLayer)
- World / Worldcoin mini-app agent: Optimism / World
- Cross-chain agent (multi-chain settlement): CCTP V2 + use Base as the home chain
- KYC-regulated agent: Coinbase CDP on Base (Coinbase risk controls + KYC)
See chain abstraction pattern overview and three chain-abstraction solutions for detailed chain-abstraction routes.
Related
- Wiki Index
- Systems Index
- ERC-4337 Overview · Application-Layer Implementation of Account Abstraction
- ERC-4337 wallet adoption
- Pectra EIP-7691 · blob doubling and the L2 economic chain
- CCTP V2 overview · Circle USDC cross-chain burn-and-mint
- cross-chain five-pole comparison matrix
- chain abstraction pattern overview
- Polygon AggLayer architecture
- Agent Economy Index
- Coinbase CDP developer platform
- Privy + AWS AgentCore default wallet
- x402 edge integration
- embedded wallet network-effect moat
Sources
- L2Beat — Base, Arbitrum One, Optimism Mainnet metrics
- DefiLlama — chain TVL, stablecoin breakdown
- Coinbase Base documentation & blog
- Arbitrum documentation — Nitro, Orbit, Stylus, BoLD
- Optimism documentation — OP Stack, Superchain, Bedrock
- Coinbase CDP documentation — Paymaster, Smart Wallet, Agent Kit
- Privy documentation — embedded wallet, AgentCore integration
- Alchemy Account Kit documentation
- Circle CCTP V2 announcement & docs
- Stripe / Visa public blog posts on L2 stablecoin payment integration