Global DEX Aggregator comparison matrix · cross-comparison of the 8 major aggregators

TL;DR

Cross-compares the 8 major DEX aggregators as of 2026-Q2 across 8 axes: chain coverage · routing model · MEV protection · gas relay · daily volume · fee model · partner integration · governance token
The 3 quadrants of routing model: on-chain pathfinder (1inch · ParaSwap · KyberSwap · OpenOcean · OKX DEX) · RFQ (Request-For-Quote / market maker quote) (0x Protocol · Matcha · OKX DEX also includes RFQ) · batch auction (CowSwap / CoW Protocol) — Jupiter is an SVM aggregator dedicated to the Solana ecosystem
Differentiation in chain coverage: EVM-heavy (1inch · 0x · CowSwap · ParaSwap · KyberSwap · OpenOcean · OKX DEX) vs Solana-only (Jupiter) · a true multi-VM aggregator does not yet exist (OpenOcean is one of the few examples covering EVM + Solana simultaneously, but its Solana route effectively rides on Jupiter sub-routing)
The 3 major mechanisms of MEV protection: CoW Protocol’s batch auction + uniform clearing price (structurally eliminates MEV) · 1inch Fusion / 0x Settler’s intent-based + signed quote (nearly cancels MEV) · flashbots private mempool wrapper (integrated by some aggregators) — Jupiter’s MEV on Solana is mitigated by the Jito tip model
Daily volume (2026-Q2 estimate): 1inch ~$1.5-2B · Jupiter ~$1-2B (routing for 70%+ of Solana goes through it) · 0x/Matcha ~$0.8-1.2B · CowSwap ~$0.4-0.6B · KyberSwap / OKX DEX ~$0.3-0.5B · ParaSwap / OpenOcean ~$0.2-0.4B each
Governance token: 1INCH · ZRX · COW · JUP · KNC · OKB (OKX’s own token) · PSP (ParaSwap, 2024 launch) · OpenOcean OOE · the governance model and fee distribution of each differ greatly
Related: Global Dex Major Five Comparison (DEX comparison) · Solana ecosystem DEX (Solana 6 layer) · this matrix specializes in cross-comparing 8 aggregators

Wiki route

This entry sits under exchanges index. Read it against Global Dex Major Five Comparison for the underlying DEX pool layer, Solana ecosystem DEX comparison for the Solana SVM aggregator/DEX stack, global perp DEX 5 comparison for the perp-only segment, and native DEX flip incumbent pattern for chain-specific DEX dynamics. For peer Solana DEX deep dives see Jito Solana · Raydium · Orca · Pendle. For the AMM evolutionary tree see AMM design evolution and veToken host protocol flywheel. For MEV / order-flow architectural context see MEV Flashbots Suave order-flow auction. For broader CEX competition framing see Global CEX top 10 ranking comparison (2025-2026) and CEX API SDK ecosystem. For regulatory framing see FSA VASP registration · EU MiCA CASP · global VASP regulatory matrix.

Why this matrix is needed

DEX aggregators evolved from the simple pathfinders of 2020-2021年 to intent-based routing + MEV protection + cross-chain swap by 2024-2026年. Aggregators are greatly differentiated by the design of their routing model, and the path by which a user obtains “best price” differs fundamentally from one aggregator to another.

However, comparison information on aggregators is scattered — 1inch’s official materials emphasize its own RFQ + Fusion, CoW Protocol emphasizes MEV elimination via batch auction, and Jupiter emphasizes its dominance on Solana. The value of the matrix lies in comparing 8 aggregators across 8 axes on the same basis, enabling traders / exchange-integration partners / institutions making routing selections to choose “the aggregator best suited to their use case.”

Note: because aggregators ride on top of the liquidity pools of base DEXs (Uniswap / Curve / Balancer / Solana Raydium / Orca, etc.), aggregator competition becomes a meta-game of “pure routing layers that do not have their own DEX.” CowSwap (CoW Protocol) and 1inch Fusion are exceptional in that they hold their own solver / market-maker networks, reaching for “more than just the middle layer.”

Per-aggregator sections

1inch (1INCH · v6 + Fusion)

Routing model: a two-layer of on-chain Pathfinder + Fusion intent layer. The Pathfinder algorithm searches paths across all DEX liquidity (Uniswap v2/v3/v4 + Curve + Balancer + Sushiswap + 100+ AMM) and optimizes gas + slippage. Fusion is an intent-based bidding layer launched in 2023年, where users submit signed orders, resolvers (MEV searchers / market makers) bid competitively, and 1inch itself intermediates order matching.

Chain coverage: EVM-only (Ethereum + Arbitrum + Optimism + Polygon + BNB Chain + Base + Avalanche + zkSync Era + others, 11+ chains). Solana / Aptos / Sui are out of scope (intentionally EVM-first).

MEV protection mechanism: in Fusion intent-based mode, resolvers keep MEV at swap execution minimal (an incentive whereby resolver competition refunds MEV value to the user) · classical pathfinder mode is MEV exposed. Optional flashbots integration exists.

Gas relayer support: in Fusion mode, resolvers pay gas and the user is gasless. Pathfinder mode uses the user’s own gas.

Daily volume: ~$1.5-2B/day (2026-Q2 estimate · DefiLlama aggregators board). The leader position among EVM aggregators.

Fee model: Pathfinder is no-fee (LP fee only) · in Fusion, a fee from resolvers (small spread) · via partner integration, a referral fee can be set.

Partner integrations: via MetaMask Swaps (MetaMask adopts 1inch as one of 1 default routing providers) · Coinbase Wallet · TrustWallet, and many others.

Governance token: 1INCH (2020年 launch · 2022年 migration to a veToken model · veINCH voting decides fee distribution + the resolver whitelist).

0x Protocol / Matcha (ZRX · Settler · RFQ)

Routing model: RFQ-first hybrid. 0x Protocol obtains signed quotes from professional market makers (Wintermute · GSR · Jane Street, etc.) and simultaneously compares on-chain liquidity to select the best. Settler (launched in 2024年) implements an MEV-resistant smart router. Matcha is a UI that wraps 0x Protocol for consumers.

Chain coverage: EVM multi-chain (Ethereum + Arbitrum + Optimism + Polygon + Base + BNB Chain + Avalanche + others, 9+).

MEV protection mechanism: RFQ quotes are private and signed · MEV searchers cannot front-run with a sandwich (it executes at the moment the maker commits to a price). Settler protects classical AMM swaps too with permit2 + and a smart router.

Gas relayer support: via the 0x API, the user pays gas · some partners (Coinbase Wallet, etc.) support gasless via meta-transactions.

Daily volume: ~$0.8-1.2B (the total via Matcha + the 0x API). The ratio of professional market-maker liquidity is higher than other aggregators.

Fee model: a 0.15% protocol fee is standard (2024-2025 phased rollout) · a partner referral fee can be set.

Partner integrations: Coinbase Wallet swap · MetaMask Swaps (co-provider) · Robinhood crypto swap backend (announced in 2024年) · Brave Wallet, etc. One of 1 aggregators with the most enterprise integrations.

Governance token: ZRX (2017年 launch · ZRX staking + governance · a fee-distribution discussion is underway in 2024年).

CowSwap / CoW Protocol (COW · Batch Auction)

Routing model: Batch auction with uniform clearing price. Users send an intent (sell X for at least Y) · all orders within a ~12-second batch window are matched by CoW (Coincidence of Wants) · the remainder is settled by solvers on external AMM/RFQ. Because uniform clearing price makes all orders of the same token pair settle at the same price, MEV (sandwich + frontrunning) structurally cannot arise.

Chain coverage: EVM (Ethereum mainnet + Gnosis Chain + Arbitrum + Base · as of 2026-Q2). Multi-chain expansion is more conservative than other aggregators.

MEV protection mechanism: structurally MEV-absent — in the batch-auction model, orders are not executed individually, so sandwich attacks physically cannot arise. Solver competition converts MEV value into user surplus.

Gas relayer support: fully gasless — solvers bear the gas (deducted from swap output) · the user wallet only signs.

Daily volume: ~$0.4-0.6B (2026-Q2). Volume is smaller than other aggregators, but the size per 1 trade is large (institutions + large retail come seeking MEV-protected swaps).

Fee model: a 0.1-0.5% solver fee (a transparent method charging from user surplus) · the CowDAO fee switch was enabled in 2024年 and distributes rewards to COW stakers.

Partner integrations: Safe (Gnosis Safe) native swap integration (institutional multisigs swap on CoW) · Argent Wallet · Rabby Wallet · strong with a user base that has high demand for MEV protection.

Governance token: COW (2023年 launch · COW staking receives fees + governance).

Jupiter (JUP · Solana only)

Routing model: SVM (Sealevel) native aggregator — integrated routing across Solana’s Raydium / Orca / Meteora / Phoenix / Lifinity / Saber / others, 25+ DEXs. Jupiter v6 integrates transaction simulation + multi-hop optimization + just-in-time liquidity.

Chain coverage: Solana alone (intentionally). Cross-chain is a separate product via Jupiter Bridge (through Wormhole).

MEV protection mechanism: Solana has a different MEV environment from Ethereum — by placing Jupiter swaps into a Jito Bundle (see Jito Solana), sandwich attacks are suppressed via Jito validator tips. Jupiter rejects transactions when the price moves significantly with Slippage Bot Protection.

Gas relayer support: Solana’s gas fees are extremely low, on the order of $0.001 — the need for gasless is lower than on EVM. Jupiter assumes the user holds their own SOL.

Daily volume: ~$1-2B (70%+ of the entire Solana DEX trading volume routes through Jupiter). The de facto gateway to the Solana ecosystem.

Fee model: 0% protocol fee (LP fee + Jito tip only) · via partner integration, a referral can be set.

Partner integrations: Phantom Wallet · Solflare Wallet · Backpack (the default swap across the entire Solana wallet ecosystem) · also expanding into Jupiter LST (Liquid Staking Token) and Jupiter Perp.

Governance token: JUP (2024-01 launch · one of the largest retroactive airdrops in Solana history · JUP staking + governance).

OpenOcean (OOE · multi-VM)

Routing model: Multi-VM pathfinder — an EVM aggregator (a 1inch-style pathfinder) + Solana sub-routing (sometimes internally calling the Jupiter API) + also covers the Move VM AMMs of Aptos / Sui. The only true multi-VM aggregator.

Chain coverage: EVM + Solana + Aptos + Sui + TON, 20+ chains. The largest number of chains in coverage.

MEV protection mechanism: Flashbots Protect integration (EVM) · Jito Bundle integration (Solana) · there is no MEV elimination at the protocol layer, but it passes through each chain’s MEV mitigation.

Gas relayer support: Chain-specific — partial meta-transactions on EVM · on Solana, gas is low to begin with.

Daily volume: ~$0.2-0.4B (2026-Q2). Coverage is broad, but volume on each chain is smaller than other EVM-specialists.

Fee model: 0.1% protocol fee · partner referral fee.

Partner integrations: integrated with many wallets on each chain (MetaMask · Phantom · Pontem · Suiet, etc.) · cross-chain swap functionality (via LayerZero / Wormhole) is a differentiator.

Governance token: OOE (2021年 launch · staking + governance).

ParaSwap (PSP · pathfinder + RFQ hybrid)

Routing model: Pathfinder + RFQ hybrid — its own ParaSwapPool (providing market-maker RFQ) + an external AMM pathfinder · Delta (an intent-based layer launched in 2024年) for gasless intent swaps.

Chain coverage: EVM (Ethereum + Arbitrum + Optimism + Polygon + Base + Avalanche + BNB Chain + zkEVM, etc., 11+ chains).

MEV protection mechanism: MEV mitigation at the Delta intent layer · classical pathfinder mode is MEV exposed · MEV elimination is weaker compared with 1inch / CowSwap.

Gas relayer support: Delta is gasless · classical pathfinder uses user gas.

Daily volume: ~$0.2-0.4B (2026-Q2). Hidden in the shadow of 1inch / 0x, its market share is on a declining trend.

Fee model: Free pathfinder · a protocol fee from Delta · partner referral fee.

Partner integrations: integrated with retail wallets such as Argent · Ledger Live · Zerion.

Governance token: PSP (2021年 launch · a fee-distribution model upgrade in 2024年 · sePSP staking).

KyberSwap (KNC · Aggregator + own AMM)

Routing model: a dual line of the KyberSwap Aggregator (pathfinder) + Kyber Elastic (its own concentrated-liquidity AMM). The Aggregator routes both external AMMs + its own Elastic.

Chain coverage: 15+ chains (Ethereum + Arbitrum + Optimism + Polygon + Base + BNB Chain + Avalanche + Linea + zkSync + Mantle + others).

MEV protection mechanism: after the 2023年 hack, the core router was extensively re-audited · a MEV protection layer is not built in · users are MEV exposed.

Gas relayer support: Limited — assumes the user’s own gas.

Daily volume: ~$0.3-0.5B (2026-Q2).

Fee model: 0% aggregator fee · Kyber Elastic LP fee (swap fee from the pool).

Partner integrations: Krystal Wallet · MetaMask, etc. Strong in the Vietnam / SEA market.

Governance token: KNC (2017年 launch · 2022年 migration · KNC staking + governance · KyberDAO).

Note: there is a history of KyberSwap Elastic suffering a $48M exploit in 2023-11 (a complex AMM tick-liquidity vulnerability) · even after the fix, TVL has not recovered. The Aggregator continues, but its own Elastic is effectively in a wind-down state. For details, see Global Dex Major Five Comparison and peers.

OKX DEX Aggregator (OKB · centralized-backed)

Routing model: On-chain pathfinder + RFQ hybrid — integrates RFQ liquidity backed by OKX (the CEX) · a hybrid of external AMMs + the OKX Spot order book. The default swap built into the OKX Wallet.

Chain coverage: EVM + Solana + TON + Aptos + Sui, 20+ chains. Chain expansion is fast owing to the advantage of being CEX-backed.

MEV protection mechanism: Partial — via OKX RFQ liquidity it is MEV-resistant · via external AMMs it is MEV exposed.

Gas relayer support: via the OKX Wallet, partially gasless through OKX Pay integration.

Daily volume: ~$0.3-0.5B (2026-Q2). Growing steadily on the CEX-backed brand recognition and the OKX Wallet user base.

Fee model: ~0.1% protocol fee · reducible through linkage within the OKX ecosystem.

Partner integrations: OKX Wallet (default) · seamless linkage to the OKX CEX (on-chain swap → CEX deposit).

Governance token: OKB (OKX’s overall token · trading-fee discount + governance · there is no DEX-dedicated token).

Big comparison matrix table

8 aggregators × 8 axes cross-comparison (state of 2026-Q2):

Aggregator	Routing model	Chain coverage	MEV protection	Gas relayer	Daily volume (estimate)	Fee model	Partner integrations	Governance token
1inch	Pathfinder + Fusion intent	EVM 11+	Fusion intent (resolver competition) + Flashbots opt-in	Fusion: solver pays · Pathfinder: user	~$1.5-2B	Free pathfinder · Fusion small spread	MetaMask Swaps default · Coinbase Wallet · Trust	1INCH (veINCH)
0x / Matcha	RFQ-first hybrid (Settler smart router)	EVM 9+	RFQ signed quote (private) + Settler MEV-resist	Partial meta-tx via partners	~$0.8-1.2B	0.15% protocol fee	Coinbase Wallet · MetaMask co-provider · Robinhood backend	ZRX (staking)
CowSwap / CoW Protocol	Batch auction + uniform clearing price	EVM (Eth + Gnosis + Arb + Base)	Structurally MEV-free (batch CoW + uniform price)	Fully gasless (solver pays)	~$0.4-0.6B (high avg ticket)	0.1-0.5% solver fee · CowDAO fee switch on	Safe native swap · Argent · Rabby	COW (staking)
Jupiter	Solana SVM native aggregator (25+ Solana DEX)	Solana only	Jito Bundle integration + slippage bot protect	Low gas baseline (Solana ~$0.001)	~$1-2B (70%+ Solana DEX routing)	0% protocol fee	Phantom · Solflare · Backpack (all Solana wallet default)	JUP (2024 airdrop)
OpenOcean	Multi-VM pathfinder (EVM + Solana + Aptos + Sui + TON)	20+ chain across multi-VM	Pass-through (Flashbots EVM · Jito Solana)	Chain-specific partial	~$0.2-0.4B	0.1% protocol fee	MetaMask · Phantom · Pontem · Suiet	OOE (staking)
ParaSwap	Pathfinder + RFQ + Delta intent layer	EVM 11+	Delta intent partial · pathfinder exposed	Delta gasless · pathfinder user-pay	~$0.2-0.4B	Free pathfinder · Delta fee	Argent · Ledger Live · Zerion	PSP (sePSP)
KyberSwap	Aggregator + own Kyber Elastic AMM	EVM 15+	None (post-2023 hack focus on safety not MEV)	Limited	~$0.3-0.5B	0% agg fee · Elastic LP fee	Krystal · MetaMask · SEA market	KNC (KyberDAO)
OKX DEX	On-chain pathfinder + RFQ (CEX backed)	20+ chain EVM + Solana + TON + Aptos + Sui	Partial (RFQ MEV-resist · external AMM exposed)	Partial (OKX Pay gasless paths)	~$0.3-0.5B	~0.1% protocol fee · OKX ecosystem discount	OKX Wallet default · CEX seamless on/off ramp	OKB (CEX-wide)

How to read the matrix:

Horizontally: profiling each of the 1 aggregators × 8 axes · vertically: comparing the differences of the same axis × 8 aggregators
Routing-model differences: Pathfinder (1inch · ParaSwap · KyberSwap · OpenOcean) vs RFQ-heavy (0x · OKX) vs Batch auction (CowSwap) vs Solana SVM native (Jupiter). The user experience differs fundamentally — RFQ quotes instantly · pathfinder does real-time on-chain calc · batch auction waits ~12s for matching
MEV-protection-strength ranking: CowSwap (structural) > 1inch Fusion (intent) > 0x (RFQ private quote) > OKX RFQ partial > the rest (exposed or minimal)
Chain coverage: OpenOcean + OKX DEX are the multi-chain top · 1inch / 0x / CowSwap / ParaSwap / KyberSwap are EVM-only · Jupiter is Solana only. True multi-VM aggregators are still few
Governance token + fee distribution model: COW · ZRX · 1INCH have a fee switch underway / enabled · JUP / OOE / PSP / KNC have token utility centered on governance · OKB is a CEX-wide token

Composition / use case patterns

Pattern A — “Retail EVM trader, MetaMask default”:

MetaMask Swaps calls 1inch + 0x co-provider behind the scenes · the user receives the best quote without being conscious of aggregator selection
MEV protection is at the level of flashbots opt-in · sufficient for mid-sized retail trades (< $10K)

Pattern B — “Solana memecoin / spot trader”:

From any of Phantom / Solflare / Backpack, nearly all Solana DEXs route on one screen via Jupiter · there is no reason to choose another aggregator
MEV mitigation with Jito Bundle · slippage protection absorbs the volatility of memecoins

Pattern C — “Large-lot trade / institutional trader”:

CoW Protocol as the default choice — batch auction + uniform price for MEV-free + price improvement via solver competition + Safe multisig native integration
Alternative: obtain professional market-maker quotes via 0x RFQ · execute large-lot trades with Wintermute / GSR

Pattern D — “Cross-chain swap”:

Choose an aggregator with broad chain coverage such as OpenOcean (multi-VM) or OKX DEX (EVM + Solana + TON, etc.)
Cross-chain swaps via LayerZero / Wormhole are built into the aggregator
Alternative route: a combination of a dedicated cross-chain bridge (see cross-chain bridge eight-pole comparison) + a same-chain aggregator

Pattern E — “CEX-integrated user”:

An OKX Wallet user does an on-chain swap on OKX DEX → seamlessly deposits to the OKX CEX, or the reverse
A Coinbase Wallet user does a 0x backed swap → seamless linkage to the Coinbase exchange
The biggest wedge of CEX-backed aggregators is minimizing on/off-ramp friction

Pattern F — “Developer / dApp embedding swap”:

The 0x API (swap quote API) has the most enterprise integrations — CEX backends of Coinbase / Robinhood / etc. consume the 0x quote API
The 1inch API has many wallet integrations · the CowSwap API has many smart-contract / multisig-protocol integrations

Boundary cases / future trajectory

Spread of intent-based routing:

1inch Fusion (2023) · CowSwap (2021~) · ParaSwap Delta (2024) shift to an intent-based / solver-competition model
An intent is a model where the user sends a signed order · solvers execute — evolving from pathfinder algorithmic competition to solver / market-maker competition
2026 trend: all major EVM aggregators hold an intent layer · the classical pathfinder is a fallback for long-tail tokens / small trades where intent is unavailable

Integration of cross-chain aggregation:

OpenOcean / OKX DEX / Jupiter Bridge, etc. offer “cross-chain swap” on one screen
Behind the scenes, it passes through cross-chain protocols such as LayerZero / Wormhole / Hyperlane / CCTP V2 (cross-chain bridge eight-pole comparison)
The chain-abstraction pattern (chain abstraction overview) further integrates the aggregator UX — the user swaps without being conscious of the chain

Pressure to standardize MEV protection:

In 2024-2025年, “retail MEV exposure” regulatory discussion under EU MiCA + US SEC
Robinhood crypto / Coinbase Wallet partially MEV-protect with a 0x backed swap · the direction is for MEV protection to become a default requirement for institutional retail flow
The CoW Protocol model is the only answer that can structurally eliminate MEV · there is a possibility that other aggregators imitate it in 2027-2028

Blurring of the boundary between RFQ and AMM:

0x RFQ wins for large-lot token pairs where professional market-maker quotes surpass the depth of AMM-style liquidity
With Uniswap v4 hooks, AMMs become able to accept “RFQ-style maker quotes” (deployed 2025-2026 )
Result: aggregators mix AMM and RFQ transparently in routing — from the user’s viewpoint, the difference becomes invisible

The threat of CEX-backed aggregators such as OKX / Coinbase:

Centralized-backed aggregators (OKX DEX · 0x backed swap on Coinbase) challenge pure-DeFi aggregators (1inch / CowSwap) with the wedge of on/off-ramp + KYC + institutional liquidity
On the regulatory side, CEX-backed aggregators comply with MiCA / FSA / SEC · they can absorb institutional retail flow
2027+: a shift could occur where CEX-backed aggregators occupy 50%+ of retail volume · pure-DeFi aggregators need to differentiate by providing MEV-resistance + transparency

Jupiter’s Solana dominance and non-Solana expansion:

Jupiter occupies 70%+ of Solana’s DEX routing · the de facto gateway to the Solana ecosystem
The 2024年 JUP airdrop gives community ownership + governance · expanding Solana DAO governance influence
Non-Solana expansion (via Jupiter Bridge Wormhole) is at an experimental stage · a strategy of maintaining Solana focus

Aggregators’ own MEV-extraction competition:

A model of keeping / redistributing MEV value at the solver / resolver layer while claiming “MEV elimination” (CowSwap · 1inch Fusion) is spreading
A fee switch distributing solver MEV revenue to COW stakers · 1INCH stakers is underway
Challenge: balancing full MEV refund to users vs fee distribution to token holders · debated in DAO governance

Governance token + fee-switch-enable trend:

In 2024-2026年, a fee switch for COW · ZRX · 1INCH, etc., is enabled / proposals are underway
For anti-token-mode Jupiter (JUP) and Robinhood-backed 0x backed swap as well, the destination of collected fees is a subject of debate
Regulatory uncertainty from the SEC / MiCA on token fee distribution is a headwind

Long-tail token coverage competition:

How many tokens / pools an aggregator can route is the core competition of the pathfinder model
Pathfinder speed + AMM coverage handling memecoins / niche tokens (integrating niche AMMs such as Curve / Balancer / KyberSwap Elastic) is important
Jupiter is at the core of the Solana memecoin economy · 1inch / 0x are strong on EVM long-tail

Embedded wallet × Agentic swap:

Embedded wallets such as Privy / Coinbase CDP / Crossmint (Privy · Stripe-owned embedded self-custodial wallet (overview)) call the aggregator backend
AI agents (agent protocol mainnet adoption) obtain aggregator quotes as a paid API via x402 · execute MEV-protected swaps
2026-2027 trend: agents consume CowSwap / 1inch Fusion as the default route · MEV protection becomes a mandatory requirement in agentic commerce

Regulatory wildcard — do aggregators qualify as CASP/VASP?:

Whether EU MiCA makes aggregators (no self-order placement · routing only) subject to CASP obligations is a grey area
Japan’s FSA treats aggregators themselves as not requiring VASP registration (non-custodial routing), but CEX-backed aggregators (OKX DEX, etc.) are a separate discussion
The EU MiCA TA (Technical Advice) of 2026-2027年 is expected to clarify aggregator categorization · a major factor in regulatory-risk variation

Sources

1inch · https://1inch.io/
0x Protocol · https://0x.org/
Matcha (0x consumer UI) · https://matcha.xyz/
CoW Protocol · https://cow.fi/
Jupiter (Solana) · https://jup.ag/
OpenOcean · https://openocean.finance/
ParaSwap · https://www.paraswap.io/
KyberSwap · https://kyberswap.com/
OKX Web3 DEX · https://www.okx.com/web3/dex
DefiLlama aggregators dashboard · https://defillama.com/aggregators
Dune Analytics dashboards · https://dune.com/